5. Case studies
This section presents the implementation of the Ecosystem Services Approach in six case studies including, when relevant to the local context, the implementation of the triage process, of ecosystem services methods and of scenario building methods.
Click on map to access the different case studies.
The work presented here has been developed in the six following case studies of the VALMER Interreg 4A Channel project (2012-2015).
Section outline
5 CASE STUDIES 
5.1 NORTH DEVON
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from O. Langmead6, T. Hooper8, C. Griffiths6, N. Beaumont8 and S. Guilbert3
5.1.1 Site description 5.1.2 Focus of study 5.1.3 Key stakeholders and their involvement 5.1.4 Method to determine which ecosystem services were the focus 5.1.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment method and key results 5.1.6 Scenario process 
5.1.6.1 Scenario phase 1: Characterising the North Devon Case Study area 5.1.6.2 Scenario phase 2: Identifying the scenario themes using stakeholder consultation 
5.1.6.2.1 Final scenario 1: Marine Conservation Zone designation 5.1.6.2.2 Final scenario 2: Aggregate extraction 5.1.6.2.3 Final scenario 3: Aquaculture development 5.1.6.3 Scenario phase 3: Establishing the key variables and developing pressure maps 5.1.6.4 Scenario phase 4: Developing and parameterizing the socio-ecological model 5.1.6.5 Scenario phase 5: Scenario modelling 5.1.7 Conclusions
5.2 POOLE HARBOUR
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from A. Brocklesby4, K. Buchan4, W. Dodds9, T. Hooper8, L. Friedrich9, N. Beaumont8 and C. Griffiths6
5.2.1 Site Description 5.2.2 Main Activities and Uses 5.2.3 Governance Arrangements 5.2.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement 5.2.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment 5.2.6 Methods and Key Results
5.3 PLYMOUTH SOUND TO FOWEY
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from N. Smith9, P. Hoskin2, W. Dodds9, T. Hooper8, L. Friedrich9, N. Beaumont8 and C. Griffiths6
5.3.1 Site description 5.3.2 Main Activities and Uses 5.3.3 Governance Arrangements 5.3.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement 5.3.5 Selecting the Ecosystem Services Assessment Focus 5.3.6 Scenarios for Assessment 5.3.7 Methods and Results 5.3.8 Governance mapping to support the assessment
5.4 GOLFE NORMAND-BRETON
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from K. Dedieu1, F. Morisseau1, R. Mongruel5 and E. Thiébaut10
5.4.1 Site description 5.4.2 Main Activities and Uses 5.4.3 Governance Arrangements 5.4.4 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment 5.4.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods and Results 5.4.5.1 Linking Habitats, Functions and Services 5.4.5.2 Golfe Normand-Breton: InVEST 5.4.5.3 Golfe Normand-Breton: Ecosystem accounting 5.4.6 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios 5.4.7 Aims of scenario building process? 5.4.8 Detailed description of the scenarios approach 5.4.9 Scenario description 5.4.10 Use of scenarios outputs for management 5.4.11 Scenarios experience sharing
5.5 PARC NATUREL MARIN D'IROISE
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from A. Vanhoutte-Brunier1, P. Le Nilliot1, R. Mongruel5, A. Marzin5, M. Laurans5, O. Guyader5, D. Davoult10 and D. Vaschalde1
5.5.1 Site description 5.5.2 Main activities and uses 5.5.3 Governance Arrangements 5.5.4 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment 5.5.5 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods 5.5.6 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios 5.5.7 Aims of scenario building process? 5.5.8 Detailed description of the scenarios approach 5.5.9 Advantages and disadvantages of the scenarios methods used? 5.5.10 Scenario description 5.5.11 Use of scenarios outputs for management 5.5.12 Scenarios experience sharing
5.6 PARC NATUREL REGIONAL DU GOLFE DU MORBIHAN
Section coordination by M. Philippe11, J. Ballé-Béganton11 and D. Bailly11 based on written contributions from J. Herry7 and M. Philippe11
5.6.1 Site description 5.6.2 Main Activities and Uses 5.6.3 Governance Arrangements 5.6.4 Key stakeholders and their involvement 5.6.5 Aims of the Ecosystem Services Assessment 5.6.6 Ecosystem Services Assessment Methods and Results 5.6.7 Links between the Ecosystem Services Assessment and the scenarios 5.6.8 Aims of the scenario building process? 5.6.9 Detailed description of the scenarios approach 5.6.10 Scenario description 5.6.11 Use of scenarios outputs for management 5.6.12 Scenarios experience sharing
1 Agence des Aires Marines Protégées
2 Cornwall Council
3 Devon County Council / Devon Maritime Forum
4 Dorset County Council/Dorset Coast Forum
5 Ifremer
6 Marine Biological Association of the UK
7 Parc Naturel Régional du Golfe du Morbihan
8 Plymouth Marine Laboratory
9 Plymouth University
10 Station Biologique de Roscoff – Université Pierre et Marie Curie
11 Université de Bretagne Occidentale – Brest/ UMR AMURE
